Comments on: JavaScript Frameworks Compared

By: Sam

Sam — Thu, 06 Mar 2008 05:40:37 +0000

I use script.aculo, just cause it was the first I heard of. Will try the other ones…

By: Fredrik Bränström

Fredrik Bränström — Wed, 14 Nov 2007 07:07:19 +0000

I do agree with Harald on MooTools. It has a very readable and logical syntax and there are lots of neat, useful classes written for it. You should take a closer look at it.

By: JavaScript Frameworks Compared » Die ContentSchmiede

JavaScript Frameworks Compared » Die ContentSchmiede — Mon, 12 Nov 2007 09:53:28 +0000

[…] und knackige Kurzübersicht über die fünf erstgenannten Frameworks findet sich bei zen perfect - interessant für alle, die in das Thema reinschnuppern und einen ersten Eindruck lesen […]

By: Harald

Harald — Tue, 04 Sep 2007 09:50:03 +0000

In your entry it seems like MooTools is only nice for fx, a common opinion since people know moo.fx as extension based on prototype. But its really a full featured Ajax framework like Prototype with even more features, like the included solid Fx system, Chaining and custom Events. It also provides compact helpers for Cookies, Hash, Sortables, Drag&Drop, Json, Tooltips, Assets (loading Images, scripts) … everything a developer needs in one compact library with a clean API

By: BlogBuzz August 18, 2007 » Webmaster-Source

BlogBuzz August 18, 2007 » Webmaster-Source — Sat, 18 Aug 2007 15:38:24 +0000

[…] Which JavaScript framework is the one for you? I like Prototype/Script.aculo.us personally. ZenPerfect.com reviews Prototype/Script.aculo.us, jQuery, Yahoo UI Library, MooTools, and points you in the direction of some others. […]

By: Grilled Cheese Mornings » Blog Archive » Javascript libraries compared

Grilled Cheese Mornings » Blog Archive » Javascript libraries compared — Wed, 15 Aug 2007 22:12:56 +0000

[…] found this comparison on one of the tutorial sites I frequent and thought it was a pretty good read. This guy does a […]